GPS Pathfinder Office Free Download Information: Free Download 64 is not responsible for software you are downloading nor for details provided about the software 'GPS Pathfinder Office 5.2' listed here, as the developer can modify information without notifying us. *I am currently looking into the Trimble Positions add-in for ArcMap Desktop to simplify this process a lot more.GPS Pathfinder Office GPS Pathfinder Office 5.2 Trimble® GPS Pathfinder® Office software is a powerful and easy-to-use software package of GNSS postprocessing tools incorporating Trimble® DeltaPhase™ differential correction technology, designed to develop GIS information that is Trimble® GPS Pathfinder® Office software is a powerful and easy-to-use software package of GNSS postprocessing tools incorporating Trimble® DeltaPhase™ differential correction technology, designed to develop GIS information that is consistent, reliable, and accurate from GNSS data collected in the field. I'm curious to hear what, if any, progress you have made on your question. After extensive testing using this ground control, I settled upon using ArcMap for all transformations and leaving PFO and TerrsSync in Lat/Long. This will allow you to test the different projection/transformation and correction workflows to isolate where unexpected errors are happening.
My solution was to have ground control surveyed on my site that I could use for testing. It prevents me from ever being able to display my points accurately relative to my background imagery on the GeoXH in the field. This gets even more complicated when, like in my case, your RTK base station is in another coordinate system, and applies a transformation that doesn't get documented. You can more easily manage your transformations in ArcMap, and they get updated with documentation. SSFs don't store projection info, because they aren't projected they are in what ESRI calls an Geographic Coordinate System (lat/long). Leaving PFO in lat/long (WGS84) seems to simplify things and prevent outdated or double transformations from occurring.
Luckily, I don't have multiple sites in different coordinate systems like you. It it baffling that what are considered "projects" in PFO do not remember something as essential as the set coordinate system or am I missing a setting? Would it be better just to reproject the source shapefiles to lat/lon, import and leave PFO and TerraSync in lat/lon, and then reproject in ArcGIS (back to SP or UTM, whatever) to avoid changing the coord sys in PFO and TerraSync back and forth? And is the projection info stored inside the SSF? I know the data only come in as lat/lon from a sat. How do I simplify or streamline this workflow? Back in PFO, I set the coord sys to whatever their data is in (sometimes it's the same - yay!), transfer, open, diff correct (*question on that later) Export -> set coord system, and back into ArcGIS it goes.Set the imp as a background file, they collect the data, email it back (or toss the GeoXH on my desk). Then in TerraSync: Setup -> Coord Sys -> NAD83 NC SP feet.Data Transfer -> Send -> Select the file. Import -> select the shapefile and set the coord sys to NAD83 NC SP feet. In PFO: Options -> Coord Sys -> set to NAD83 NC SP feet.On one site, I start with GIS source data in say NAD83 NC State Plane feet.We're using GeoXH receivers and here's my current flow: I can go from WGS84 UTM 18N meters on one project to NAD83 TX SP E feet to multiple others in one day. We have GPS survey projects all over the country (CONUS and OCONUS) and I am wondering what the best practice is for having to deal with multiple coordinate systems.
0 kommentar(er)
